synology nas 2 bay No Further a Mystery
synology nas 2 bay No Further a Mystery
Blog Article
@7rich79 says: twelfth July 2024 at 3:39 pm If this doesn’t come with a 10gb interface crafted-in, it’s just not that desirable to me. I’m not too fussed irrespective of whether that be 10GbE or SFP+, but you should don’t make me obtain a proprietary enlargement card to make it take place. REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Why refresh these concurrently? Some solutions like the DS1823xs+ or DS224+ are very early of their predicted run, so a refresh so soon seems unnecessary. So why now?
With the emergence of unified storage, vendors sought to improve big-scale file storage with SAN/NAS convergence. This consolidates block- and file-based mostly info on one particular storage array. Convergence supports SAN block I/O and NAS file I/O in a similar set of switches.
Enterprise NAS gear is designed with more significant-end details attributes to assist storage administration and frequently will come with a minimum of four drive bays.
Plex is suitable with a wide range of NAS devices that should operate its application, but lots of them are limited to application transcoding.
We're creating modifications to how you purchase HDD and flash products from the Western Electronic family members of manufacturers.
At enough time of this writing, there are actually 260 responses and I have found only a small handful of good thoughts sprinkled in. And perhaps People are actually just in protection of employing older CPUs; I don’t see ANY which have been genuinely fired up. REPLY ON YOUTUBE
At 50 % the price of the DS1825+ I should purchase a UNAS Professional plus a Raspberry Pi to take care of the movie element in a much more skilled manner.
It's also worthy of noting that Western Digital has centered on equipping the EX2 with rapidly hardware, specially with a target media streaming overall performance.
@patrickg1958 states: thirteenth March 2025 at 8:39 am Feels like Synology have just stopped trying in the house / SMB section. I won’t be purchasing a system employing dated sections (but which I'd personally want to operate for many years into the long run) and run by a firm that doesn’t seem to treatment about what (it appears to me) a lot of consumers want.
I keep a 224+ for do the job data files and that’s enough for standard storage. Total the Synology refresh is just somewhat “meh”. REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Meanwhile, buyers may perhaps transform, delete, rename, and insert information as they need. The result would be that the backed up information doesn’t match any unique position in time of the initial, i.e. in comparison to the source. The folder composition over the backup NAS winds up being inconsistent. A constant backup is really a “freeze” of the folder composition, to make sure that whatever end users change when the backup is working, and Regardless of how long the backup can take, the backup is certain to be consistent and it displays the complete information on the initial server at a very precise level in time. Even if NAS sync characteristics had been reliable, without the regularity function the NAS sync options are worthless for essential enterprise data and for that reason not advised.
With recent HDD capacities not remaining meaningfully different for most functions it’s sad to find out that Synology is artificially segmenting their lineup to guard the likes of DS1618+ or DS1817.
But what does website that indicate, given that most NAS equipment are previously Mac-compatible? It can be all about optimization for what customers usually tend to make use of the NAS for. In the situation of Mac customers, you'll be wanting a network storage system which is rapid and intuitive, which is what exactly WD's 4TB EX2 Extremely is.